Extent of the cultural-Marxist occupation of society

© November 2022 Paul Cooijmans

Disclaimer

For legal purposes, anything expressed in this essay is to be taken as a conspiracy theory resulting from paranoid-delusional thinking.

Introduction

This is an attempt to summarize the extent of the cultural-Marxist colonization of Western society as of late 2022, a good century after what is considered the origin of the movements that make up cultural Marxism, and on the understanding that aspects of it are decades older, but their coordination toward a common goal became apparent after the First World War.

Essential aims of cultural Marxism are to undermine democracy in the West, destroy the nation states, and replace native Western (White) populations, through decades-long orchestrated mass immigration and differential fertility, with multi-ethnic, multiracial non-societies without any sense of national identity. These may then be controlled and parasitized on by a supranational and eventually global government, sometimes called "new world order". This process of globalization is well underway in North America, the European Union, Australia, and New Zealand — the axis of evil in the world today — but less so in much of the rest of the world, possibly because the openness, universal ethics, lack of ethnocentrism, and potential for upward social mobility for newcomers in the West make Western countries more vulnerable to such a hostile takeover.

While the invasion of the West approaches (or has reached) the point of irreversibility, the invader uses Western resources to try and beat the rest of world, country by country, into submission via economic, military, or biological warfare. Many Western governments are de facto marionettes of non-governmental organizations and multinational corporations, who hold the real power and are the pre-stage of a possible (or projected) future world government. The difficulty in reversing this trend is that democracy has been so thoroughly subverted that no matter what people vote, the outcome will be a government that rules against the interest of the people. This problem is acerbated by the dropping numbers of the native populations, who, as a result of ongoing immigration and differential fertility, will be minorities on their own breeding grounds within decades, so that even with honest elections they can not win.

A criticism sometimes heard of the above analysis, both from cultural Marxists and ignorant Westerners, is that globalization is "inevitable" and occurs spontaneously rather than intentionally; that there is no "conspiracy" behind it. However, a large abundance of evidence shows full intentionality and international coordination behind the striving for liberal immigration policies and ethnic, racial, and cultural pluralism in Western countries for over a century. The public's ignorance thereof is a result of cultural Marxism's dominance of the media, educational systems, academia, legislation, and law, which enables them to hide this evidence and make it punishable to refer to it.

The current state of this genocide is that Western civilization is marked for soon destruction and the Caucasoid subspecies doomed to live on as a minority in an ethnically divided non-assimilated environment, where the various groups are in direct resource competition and the professional middle class has been eradicated; this is the kind of world that globalists desire and can most easily control. Effectively, it is a return to medieval feudalism, with a hereditary elite ruling the underclasses, who have no civil rights. Our only hope is a rapid and hitherto unseen rise of nationalism and collectivism, and revival of more homogeneous, assimilated, coherent nation states; movements of that nature are indeed apparent in a few countries, consistently demonized as far-right, fascist, and racist by the dominant elites. A point of attention with those initiatives is always whether they are genuine, or mere decoys to steal votes from conservatives and nationalists to thus neutralize and paralyse that part of the electorate. Another phenomenon of interest concerns the so-called neo-conservatives, who may be described as cultural Marxists who have become more conservative after feeling the negative effects of the mass immigration they themselves (or their predecessors) have fomented, but are not true allies of nationalism and still support globalization.

Remark on the lists

It would require a book-length work to discuss each of the below listed societal segments in detail. Instead, they are given without further comment. While one may debate whether this or the other item is placed correctly here, these lists will help the reader to identify and understand what is going on in the world around one. Do notice that the first list is markedly longer than the second, much of which is headed for annihilation.

List of societal segments that are largely under control of cultural Marxists

List of societal segments that are still relatively free of cultural Marxism

Further reading

To learn whether you are a cultural Marxist, see the Cooijmans Inventory of Neo-Marxist Attitudes.