Frequently asked questions
Click on a question to go to the answer and use the <Home> key on your keyboard to return to the top of the page if needed.
Please first try to find the answer on this page, the rest of the web location, or elsewhere on the Internet via a search engine. If that fails one may consider asking it by electronic mail (popularly known as "e-mail").
Please ask only the first, wait for the answer, and read it before sending a next one. When multiple questions are asked at the same time, the second and further typically become superfluous or change after seeing the first answer (which tends to be different from what the asker expects) so that time and effort put into answering the second and further questions would be wasted (and no, the asker can not determine beforehand whether or not the further questions are sufficiently unrelated to not become superfluous, as experience has borne out). Also, the answerer is not a machine that automatically responds to questions and has nothing else to do; rather, the answerer is a creative person who needs one's time to be productive, and whose time one is taking up by requiring questions to be answered. Answering questions takes much more time and effort than asking them. Quickly typing a list of questions and then expecting the answerer to spend hours answering them is asymmetrical and unfair; one is then treating the other person like a mindless robot. Note that there are two reasons for "one question at a time" given in this paragraph, which are each in themselves sufficient (experience shows that many overlook the second reason, which starts with "Also," hence this remark).
Please send only the first, wait for the reply, and read and try to understand it before sending a possible next one. Sending multiple messages in a row without waiting for a reply is rude, pushy behaviour and will with utmost certainty be held against you. It is like screaming at the other person, "Why are you so slow?! Why are you not responding?!" And no, this is not a peculiarity of mine; this is standard "netiquette".
Please refer to it by providing its uniform resource locator, and quote the pertinent passage correctly and integrally. This will prevent you from putting words into my mouth and thus asking about something I did not actually write, which would obviously make your question unanswerable.
I am more than willing to cooperate in an interview if there is an absolute and unconditional guarantee my answers will be presented integrally and verbatim, including punctuation and spelling. Such a guarantee is self-obvious to me, but not to everyone, which is why it is mentioned here. Under this condition, interviews are a sublime way for me to communicate with the world. Obviously, meant here is an interview that will be published, not a private interview for yourself that serves only as a trick to evade the one-question restriction.
Anonymous (or pseudonymous) questions are not answered because experience has shown that anonymous or pseudonymous persons tend to have bad intentions. For clarity: To avoid being anonymous, push <Enter> (on some keyboards called <Return>) twice after typing your message, then type your name. This is not irony or patronizing, some people actually need this instruction for they do not understand the word "anonymous".
Please rephrase it into a proper form so that it is clear what you are asking. Questions starting with "What about…" are often too vague to be answered.
Please put it in the body of the message instead. The subject line is for the subject, the body for the message. That is how one naturally reads e-mail. Questions in the subject line are never answered.
That information is kept private. In the past, a list with all of my test scores was online, but after abuse it was removed. I do not claim to be extremely intelligent; people may see me thus, but that is based on their perception of me and of what I have done, and not on knowledge of actual scores.
While legally entitled to call myself a psychologist — psycholoog, in Netherlandic — I never use that title in practice. Dealing mainly with I.Q. tests and thereto related statistics, I know all too well that psychologists in general possess so shamefully little expertise in that field that presenting myself as a psychologist would not add any credence whatsoever to what I do.
Please take the assumption out, put it into a separate question, and ask that first. Questions containing assumptions can not be answered if the assumptions are wrong; and those inclined to ask questions containing assumptions often get their assumptions wrong. Example: The question "Why is two plus two five?" can not be answered because it contains the false assumption that two plus two is five. So, the proper way to go about it is to put the assumption into a separate question; that is, to first ask "Is two plus two five?"
That may succeed if you follow this advice: (1) Make the message no longer than about six simple sentences of (2) no more than about six words each, (3) use no specialist terminology, and (4) verify afterwards if the translation is meaningful. So, do not send a long message with long complex sentences containing specialist terminology without verifying the result; that may result in unintelligible nonsense, and spam filters may mark it as "junk".
I request to use capitals where required; that is, for the first letter of each sentence, the first letter of each name, the word "I", and all of the letters of acronyms and abbreviations that are conventionally written in capitals. If one takes this small trouble, one will suddenly find one's written communication to become very much more effective, not just with me but with any civilized person. Lower-case messages are not taken seriously by anyone of erudition. This reply is therefore a golden opportunity for who did not know this yet; an "eye-opener"; a "learning moment".
(This empty space is to enable your web browser to jump from the hyper references on top of the page to the relevant answers; without sufficient empty space at the bottom of the page, this process might fail for the bottom-most answers because the browser could not scroll down far enough before reaching the bottom of the page, especially with a high-resolution monitor being employed.)